Adventures of Young Van Helsing: The Quest for the Lost Scepter
| Title: | Adventures of Young Van Helsing: The Quest for the Lost Scepter |
| Year: | 2004 |
| Tagline: | It's all in the name |
| Directors: | Kevin Summerfield |
| Writers: | Craig Clyde (story) and Kevin Summerfield (story) |
| Actors: | Ken Mitzkovitz | Freddie Sabaugh | Ned Narang | Rabiah Elaawar | Tomm Bauer | Amneek Sandhu | Nahid Zoha | Kara Edwards | Omar Porter | Joe Zaso | Kimberly Botbyl | Keith Jordan | Johnny Alonso | Ken Beal | Joy Griffin |
| Rating: | 2.5 | 76 votes |
| Languages: | English |
| Color: | Color |
| Country: | USA |
| Company: | Scorpio Pictures |
| Genres: | Action | Adventure | Horror |
| Plot: | |
| 1) As if it wasn’t enough to have the troubles of everyday teen life in high school, Michael Harris has just learned that he is the last heir to Abraham Van Helsing, his great great grandfather, a relic hunter who aquired the scepter of god, a biblical artifact forged by an angel before the birth of mankind, and is now being sought after by the very being who created it! | |
| Trivia: | |
|
|
| Comments: | |
| 1) This is to director Kevin Summerfield what the Holocaust is toHitler–a masterpiece.
This seems to be a film made for tweens, but at the same time it'srather bloody and gory. If I were a tween, I'd think this film has theworst acting, ever. As an older and more mature person, I can say thatit just has the worst acting I've ever seen. The back of the boxadvertises that the story involves a "whimsical" professor. Now, I'veseen some whimsical professors in my day, but nothing tops this guy. Helooks like they walked into Whimsy Mart, asked him if he ever had ahidden passion for acting, and then superglued an Einstein wig to hishead. At one point, there's a closeup where he opens a door, and hishead moves in and out of the frame, as if saying "HA! I AM FAR TOOWHIMSICAL FOR A MEASLY CLOSE-UP!" It's also hilariously, ineptlyracist. I can't possibly believe that in the year 2004 a movie was madethat features a black man looking at something and shouting"DAAAAYYYYUUMMMM!", but this movie does. The plot, which helpfully hasa flashback at the beginning, and a bizarre tangent of a flashback nearthe end that make the plot only even more retarded. There's atime-telling device that is obviously a CD player painted tan withjewels on it. I really wonder if this wasn't a student film, but KevinSummerfield has been making movies for a few years before this one. If you see this in the five dollar bin at Wal-Mart (which thankfully Idid not have to go through the trauma of, and saw this through afriend), you probably will not want to pick it up. Unless, of course,you are a racist, retarded sort of pre-teen. 2) Actually, as bad as the movie THE ADVENTURES OF YOUNG VAN HELSING is,the as-yet-unpublished novelization is very good. I was fortunateenough to obtain a copy of the novelization by R.H. Jones before I sawthe movie, and can say that this is one instance where the writer tooktremendous liberties with the script…and the result was excellent! Infact, this is a better movie novelization than many I’ve read. It has aBuffy, the Vampire Slayer feel to it, and I felt like I was reading aTV novelization. Should you have the opportunity to read thenovelization if it ever gets published, don’t bother ever seeing themovie! 3) There is not one good thing that can be said about this awful film. The"acting" was horrible. To even call it acting is an insult to realactors. It was worse than kindergarten kids reciting a poem. Theprofessor character pushed his glasses up on his nose so often the youwanted to super glue them to his face to stop the annoyance. Thedirection was so bad that it seemed not to exist at all. The pace wasso slow that a scene that should have taken 1 minute went on for 4. Thelast scene of this atrocity was an extended music video of a tunelesssong done at a high school dance that went on forever. The only goodpart of the film occurred when "The End" flashed on the screen. 4) One word: crap. An excellent definition for the most terrible "movie"ever made. The acting was as good as a school play, the special effectswere little better than home movies, and the only reason anyone shouldever watch this movie is if they want to watch something so stupid it’sterribly funny. It is not even close to being as good as Saturday NightLives sketches, but what’s even more funny is that SNL is supposed tobe funny! So, I recommend it for widdle kids who have ADD and want towatch it with some pizza. Other than that, it deserves the GoldenTurkey Award. And I remind you what I said earlier. CRAP. And moreCrap. Nothing more, remember crap and its smell have always been funnyto people, and, of course, mostly leetle kindergarten-goers. 5) There’s a reason you this movie only cost $3, and that’s because it’shorrible. But there’sno excuse for it being sold at all. Vampires are on the loose, and onlybadacting canstop the onslaught. Wait, no, apparently bad special effects and writingwill do it too.This might be a fun movie to mute and talk over though, as it won’tdistractyou with astimulating plot or anything. One chick is hot, as long as you don’tlistento her andimagine her naked, and hot. Here’s an example of how bad this film is, they use a CD player as acountdown to thefinal confrontation. When it spins like crazy, the vampire’s are coming!!!And of course,it only spins like crazy. 6) I notice that this movie has received a few pans. Lets give KeithJordan a break. Looks like he is paying his dues in the industry. Ifyou remember Arnold in Conan the Barbarian (can we say "wooden"?), hewasn’t exactly the brightest bulb in the movie industry. He hascertainly improved! Keith should at least rate a C (even if it is justfor cute), and guess we have to give the professor an E for effort(call me an optimist). The idea is good, and though this movie remindsme of a college film project, perhaps they deserve a chance to improve.One does learn from doing. I really liked the music that was at therolling of the end credits. The xylophone was reminiscent of bones,which I am sure was the intent. I bought this with my granddaughter inmind, as I think it is aimed at a young teen audience. Lets see if theyimprove with the next one. Give ‘em a chance, people! 7) I saw this film late one night after some friends saw it in the $5 binat Wal-mart. This is quite possibly one of the worst films ever made – actingstraight out of a home movie, dialogue apparently written by an8-year-old, and the most clichéd and ridiculous plot imaginable. Don’t watch this unless you’re with a group of friends that likes tomake fun of bad movies. Oh, and btw, the last 20 minutes are basically a bad music video, sofeel free to turn it off as soon as the characters show up at theschool dance. Young Van Helsing is an Excellent film for one reason and one reasononly, but you knew that already. Yes, that reason is the shining faceof the smiling young man playing Preston. It's TJ Sicilia! When TJ'svisage loomed onto the screen at our local drive-in, all of theteeny-boppers and bobby-soxers jumped out of their trunks and backseatsto do those funky cosmic jigs of the 50's and 60's. And so will you!Once you see this film, you'll want to give TJ/Preston all of thecookies and lemonade, not just some! He's got raw, bleeding, steamingpulsating charisma and star appeal. He makes the lights in the skyseparate and become liquefied, and that's a guarantee. 9) I watched this movie with my friends because they wanted to show me oneof the worst movies of all time. They were exactly right! Not only doesthis movie have awful acting, the special effects (like for explosionsthey used firecrackers!) and music was terrible. It's hard to believethat this low quality of a movie was put into works. I will give thismovie an A for effort. I think I know how they casted this movie.First, they went to a random high school. Then, they got onto theloudspeaker and asked if the entire school wanted to be in a movie.Then, they shot this movie like a low-budget porno. People who readthis, understand that I love all types of movies, but this one did notwow me, it didn't keep me entertained, and all I could do was laugh athow awful this movie was. A 1 out of 10 is the perfect score for thismovie. 10) This is the worst movie ever!!!! My friend showed it to me because weknew one of the actors. Freddy Sabaugh? He played the little Indianboy? We were in a play with him like 3 years ago and when i saw thismovie i died!! He is super white and he is playing an Indian boy! andthat special effects are awful! there is one part where they aredriving down the road really fast to get away from the evil guy, and sothey just put a little fast-forward thingy on the tape so that it lookslike the car is moving fast, but you can totally tell that they justmade the whole shot faster cuz the trees are swaying really atfast-forward speed in the background! You really need to by this moviebecause it is so bad!!! trust me! you will be laughing so hard!Especially because the whole thing was shot in Charlotte at this crappyhigh school and in this pit that was there before they built somebuilding. And when the guy kills people it looks like they put sillyputty on this hands and made them scream a lot. And it is really badacting! Like when they go into the tomb place and the lady rises out ofthe tomb? ITS SO FAKE!!!! hahaha. GET THIS MOVIE! you will dielaughing!!! |
|